Product
Constitutional Intelligence
Identify constitutional and human-rights issues in the record — illegal detention, unlawful search, the right to an adequate defense, due process — with citations back to the facts and to the CPEUM and applicable treaties.
Qué hace
Constitutional Intelligence scans the record for facts that implicate constitutional doctrine under the Constitución Política de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos (CPEUM) and applicable international human-rights treaties, and drafts an initial analysis for attorney review. It cites both the triggering facts and the doctrinal framework applied — control de constitucionalidad and control de convencionalidad ex officio.
Cómo funciona
- 1Paso 1Facts are matched against pattern libraries for common constitutional issues under Mexican law (arts. 14, 16, 19, and 20 CPEUM: debido proceso, cateo sin orden, detención arbitraria, prueba ilícita, derecho de defensa adecuada).
- 2Paso 2Each identified issue is drafted with the triggering facts and citations to the CPEUM article, jurisprudencia, and applicable treaty.
- 3Paso 3Attorney review is required before any output is used in a filing.
Compuerta de evidencia
Cada motor de inteligencia suprime resultados no fundamentados. Nada llega a un informe si no puede vincularse con un pasaje del expediente.
Beneficios
Catch constitutional issues you might overlook in a large expediente.
See the fact pattern and the doctrine side-by-side.
Foundation for a demanda de amparo or an incidente de exclusión de prueba ilícita.
Flujo de trabajo habitual
- 1Analyze the caseEnsure Evidence Intelligence has run.
- 2Open the Constitutional panelIssues are grouped by CPEUM article and severity.
- 3Draft a motionExport an issue as the seed of an amparo or exclusion-of-evidence draft.
Ejemplos
Derecho Penal
Analysis of article 16 CPEUM on a cateo without a judicial order and of article 20 on a declaración taken without defense counsel present.
Derechos Humanos
Excessive use of force and authority liability under article 1 CPEUM and inter-American jurisprudencia.
Buenas prácticas
- Feed the constitutional output into Motion Intelligence to draft an amparo or an exclusión de prueba grounded in the same facts.
- Attach video de audiencia and body-worn/C5 footage when available — they materially change the analysis.
- Use the exported issue list as a checklist, not as a finished demanda.
Responsabilidades del abogado
El abogado conserva el control
Nyrava propone. El abogado decide. Todo resultado debe ser revisado por un profesional jurídico calificado antes de utilizarse.
- Verify every doctrinal citation against controlling jurisprudencia (SCJN, Tribunales Colegiados) for your circuito.
- Confirm the fact pattern the model relied on before advancing it.
- Decide whether raising a constitutional issue is strategically appropriate.
Escenarios frecuentes
Preparación de amparo
Chain from Constitutional Intelligence to Motion Intelligence to produce a first draft of a demanda de amparo with facts and authorities aligned.
Exclusión probatoria
Use identified illegal-search or coerced-statement issues as the seed for an incidente de exclusión de prueba ilícita.
Limitaciones de la plataforma
- Pattern libraries reflect federal CPEUM doctrine plus the most commonly litigated jurisprudencia; niche local/estatal variants may need manual expansion.
- The model does not evaluate procedural bars (preclusión, consentimiento tácito) automatically.
Preguntas frecuentes
Documentación relacionada